Getting off Apple and going all Google has increased my respect for both companies. I've come to realize that the very best mobile experience right now is built on a foundation of Google services on Apple hardware. I wish only that these two companies could get along better, and that Apple will allow more Google integration on the iPhone.
Treading dangerously, companies rush into BYOD without considering mobile security
Usually when the discussion of BYOD (bring your own device) is brought up in the workplace, potential security issues are one of the first things to be discussed. After all, if key business data, which can be something as simple as an executive's calendar or a confidential contact list, is on a smartphone that gets lost or stolen, there could be significant consequences if it falls into the hands of a competitor.
In some industries, there are expensive consequences. In healthcare, for example, lapses in security that expose patient data can net hefty fines. Earlier this year, for example, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee finalized a settlement with the Department of Health and Human Services for $1.5 million for a recent breach (on top of a $17 million price tag for the investigation and remediation actions).
That makes it all the more shocking to read this press release from OnForce, a company that matches businesses and individuals with technology professionals and consulting firms. Accord to a recent report, IT professionals working in the BYOD field have noticed a steady uptick in requests related to person devices and BYOD setups. That's not surprising considering how commonplace BYOD is becoming.
The surprising and disturbing bit is that these technicians are not seeing a comparable increase in the number of businesses that are interested in configuring mobile security and/or setting up a mobile management strategy or solution. The result, according to OnForce, seems to be companies embracing the freedom of BYOD deployments without securing the devices, apps, or data involved. If OnForce's survey results are accurate, there could be hundreds or even thousands of companies out there at extreme risk of data or privacy breaches.
That said, the report should be taken with a grain or two of salt. OnForce essentially delivers on-demand technology outsourcing. That means that its clients may have no internal IT department or may have minimal technology resources. If that's the case, then its reasonable to assume that they may simply not know to ask about security options or mobile management.
OnForce does quote Gene Morris, general manager at BrightStar Enterprise Solutions - one of the companies that works with OnForce clients - as saying that his company attempts to educate clients about security risks while configuring personally-owned devices.
"I help businesses connect and configure personal mobile devices, and at the same time consult with them about the security risks. As BYOD continues to infiltrate the business environment, we do anticipate a significant uptick in mobile security implementations in the next 8-12 months."
Even with that caveat, it's sobering to think about the potential damage that could be done to any company as a result of a mobile data breach. To know that some businesses are taking a cavalier attitude to those dangers is a rather unsettling thing to consider.
New data visualization apps for Excel 2013 could help Microsoft hang on to customers looking for better data visualization tools.
Surface has been a stiff so far, but Microsoft reportedly has big expectations for its next fiscal year. Here's why the company may not be crazy.
Brandon Porco, the chief technologist for defense contractor Northrop Grumman, says that IT will have to try lots of different things and move quickly to keep abreast of evolving employee needs. "Google has it very well-patterned: Launch and iterate."
Although Apple is often accused of not being an enterprise company, it's only in the last few years that Apple has abandoned its enterprise-oriented products. The real story may be that Apple's discovered that making enterprise-focused efforts simply don't deliver a huge return on investment.